The visa section at the Myanmar Embassy in Tokyo used to be a quiet
and lonely place, but not anymore. Pointing to boxes containing hundreds
of Japanese passports bearing business visas, the staff there told me
the deluge began in early 2012.
ANA now has all-business-class direct flights to Yangon from Tokyo,
and is operating near full capacity. The Japan External Trade
Organization (JETRO) office in Yangon reports being swamped by requests
for assistance by Japanese firms looking to cash in on Asia’s most
promising frontier. PR giant Dentsu is opening an office there this
week. I even met a young Japanese nail artist in Yangon who thought she
would try her luck in Asia’s latest boomtown.
Until a couple of years ago there were few vehicles on Yangon’s
streets, and hotel rooms went begging. The new normal, though, is
traffic jams, packed hotels and spiking rental rates for housing and
offices.
Japanese firms are in catch-up mode, lamenting that their
government’s support of U.S.-led sanctions against the military regime
opened opportunities for China and India.
Meanwhile, the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN)
members, under the guise of constructive engagement, “held their noses,
averted their eyes — and grabbed whatever they could,” said a diplomat
who prefers anonymity.
Sanctions played a crucial role in nudging Myanmar to embrace
political reforms that have taken hold with surprising rapidity since
the Saffron Revolution protests in 2007, named for the Buddhist monks
who were at the forefront of the protests, and whose robes are actually
maroon colored.
Political reforms are happening because the military/political
leaders wanted to end their nation’s isolation and benefit from having a
more prosperous economy.
They were also eager to counter China’s unappreciated dominance of
their country, and there is no love lost for India owing to resentments
accumulated during their shared history under British colonial rule.
Lifting sanctions was the key to turning on the taps of international
financial institutions and attracting needed investments and
development assistance from Western nations and Japan.
The key to ending sanctions was initially the November 2010 release
of the opposition politician and chair of the National League for
Democracy, Aung San Suu Kyi, who had been under arrest for almost 15 of
the 21 years from July 1989 — and then convincing her to participate in
the political process.
To achieve these goals required the new government under Thein Sein —
the prime minister from 2007 until his appointment to the presidency in
March 2011 — to promote substantial reforms. And it has.
“Democratization might not be in their DNA,” a consultant told me,
“but the elite see this as a means to growth and a bigger pie to slice
up.” And, once powerful interests have a growing stake in the new
system, they become its guarantors.
The gold rush of Japanese firms into Myanmar is an endorsement of
recent political gains and will help sustain the process. Yesterday, a
large Keidanren (Japan Business Federation) mission returned from
Myanmar after looking into how to improve the investment environment.
Prominent on their radar and that of the government of new Prime
Minister Shinzo Abe is Thilawa, a sleepy port about an hour’s drive east
of Yangon that’s slated for a major Japan Inc. development project. In
addition to relieving a transport bottleneck, the project includes a
special economic zone for manufacturing.
The story of how Japan landed this plum deal is revealing. As it was
reported in the Western media, Pres. Thein Sein was dining in Tokyo in
October 2011 with Hideo Watanabe, chairman of the Japan-Myanmar
Association and a former minister for posts and telecommunications.
After the president had a map brought out, he pointed to a 2,400-hectare
area around Thilawa and told Watanabe that he wanted Japan to take on
this project.
Some wrangling ensued, but in September 2012 a consortium of
government agencies and Japanese firms, including Mitsubishi, Sumitomo
and Marubeni, announced that they had lined up an $18 billion package.
It also appears that Japan will take a $3 billion stake in a similar
port project further to the south at Dawei, in which Thailand has been
the major player. That project has been stalled due to local opposition
and conflicts over land grabs.
Japanese companies, seeing stagnant sales at home, are eager to buy
into Asia’s growth prospects, and in fast-tracking this deal — and a
mega-infrastructural project in Jakarta, Indonesia, exceeding $50
billion — they are reminding observers that the “declining Japan” story
has been overdone.
In fact Team Abe’s diplomatic offensive in the region, often
portrayed as a way of highlighting China’s regional isolation over
territorial disputes in the South China and East China seas, also
signals Tokyo’s support for Japanese business participation in regional
economic growth and integration.
Overall, China is Myanmar’s largest investor — to the tune of $14
billion in FY 2011 alone, mostly in energy projects. In contrast,
between 1988-2011 Japanese firms invested a total of $217 million in
Myanmar, making Japan its 12th-largest foreign investor.
But Japan Inc. is roaring back. The Japanese government recently
forgave $3.6 billion in bilateral debt and provided a nearly $1 billion
bridging loan so that the World Bank and the Asian Development Bank
could resume lending. In addition, Japan just announced an extra $220
million in soft loans for infrastructure and human-resource development —
the first such lending in 26 years.
As in all gold rushes, there will be stiff competition from the usual
suspects, but there are many appealing opportunities in banking,
finance, telecoms, infrastructure, mining and energy — while low wages
make Myanmar a competitive manufacturing export platform.
However, legislation regarding foreign investments was only passed at
the end of 2012, and Myanmar’s judicial system is not reliable, so for
overseas investors it is a case of navigating uncharted waters.
Land grabs are one of the major challenges to the rule of law in
Myanmar, and a major source of local grievances and political
instability. According to Myanmar Legal Network, the land-acquisition
process is murky and presents significant opportunities for bribery and
manipulation of cases.
Since Thilawa is close to Yangon, where many civil-society
organizations and international institutions are based, this project
will be subject to extensive scrutiny especially as it involves regime
cronies blacklisted by the United States. Taking care of farmers and
fisherman affected by the project won’t be that costly in the larger
scheme of things — while disregarding their interests risks reputational
damage and a nationalistic backlash.
The politics of foreign investment and resource extraction are hotly
contested in Myanmar, a sign of just how vibrant democracy has become.
To its regret, China knows this story all too well, as anti-Chinese
sentiments are rampant. A high-profile conflict at a copper mine in the
north, involving the military and a Chinese company, underscores the
risk of ties with the power elite in Myanmar and the political risk to
foreign investors engaged in ventures that ignore local land rights.
While the government was explaining the need to honor contracts and the
rule of law, the public saw a shady deal displacing local residents. A
major Chinese dam project is also suspended due to protests against
displacement of local communities.
A gold rush generates a no-holds-barred mentality, and in Myanmar,
regional competitors have a head start — but Japan Inc.’s ace up its
sleeve compared to its rivals is an enviable reputation for integrity as
an investor and employer. That’s a brand to trade on that’s well worth
preserving.
source: The Japan Times
http://www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2013/02/10/asia-pacific/gold-rush-japan-inc-flocks-to-myanmar/#.URcJcMWneSo
No comments:
Post a Comment